Act 1 Results – Voters choose ‘No’

Voters across Pennsylvania voted overwhelmingly against Act 1 referendum questions during last Tuesday’s primary election. Only four of Pennsylvania’s 498 school districts, including Bristol Borough in

Bucks
County, approved the tax shift designed to provide homeowners with greater reductions in property taxes.


Pennsylvania’s Taxpayer Relief Act (ACT 1) mandated that school districts place a referendum question on the May 15, 2007 primary election ballot asking voters whether earned income (EIT) or personal income (PIT) taxes should be increased, or instituted for the purpose of reducing real estate taxes on qualified residential properties. All school districts in Pennsylvania, other than Philadelphia, Pittsburg and
Scranton, are required to place a referendum question on the ballot.
Click here to see the referendum question and result for each school district in Bucks, Chester, Delaware and

Montgomery
Counties.  

Newtown Supervisors upheld sidewalk request

Newtown Township Supervisors upheld resident’s requests for sidewalks along an 8,000 square foot commercial property development on Ellis Avenue. Supervisors added other conditions including a privacy fence, replacement of any removed trees, limited site lighting and reimbursement in lieu of open space.

Pennsylvania’s Taxpayer Relief Act (Act 1) referendum questions available on SRA (Suburban REALTORS Alliance) website


Pennsylvania’s Taxpayer Relief Act (ACT 1) mandates that school districts place a referendum question on the May 15, 2007 primary election ballot asking voters whether earned income (EIT) or personal income (PIT) taxes should be increased, or instituted for the purpose of reducing real estate taxes on qualified residential properties. All school districts in Pennsylvania, other than Philadelphia, Pittsburg and
Scranton, are required to place a referendum question on the ballot. The Suburban REALTORS® Alliance (SRA) is urging voters to educate themselves about ACT 1 and the important tax-shifting referendum questions.
·         Click here to view the referendum questions appearing on the ballot in Bucks, Chester, Delaware and

Montgomery
Counties·         Click here to access the SRA’s “Act 1 Primer- Understanding the Question on your May Ballot”

Westtown development still uncertain

The Westtown Planning Commission is reviewing zoning changes that would permit construction of a large retirement community and business center. Presby Homes and Services has developed preliminary plans to build a continuing care retirement community on 330 acres of Crebilly Farm located west of Route 202 along Route 926. The development would include 400 independent and assisted-living residences and a nursing facility with 80 beds. Before Presby Homes can submit a formal preliminary plan to the township, the planning commission must submit several land zoning changes to the Board of Supervisors.

Newtown approves septic treatment plant

Township officials approved a proposed septic treatment facility on the Garrett-Williamson tract, making final approval from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection the last hurdle for the $15 million public project. The planned reverse-osmosis treatment plant would utilize drip fields, not spraying, to return high-quality effluent to the aquifer. The plant will handle up to 300,000 gallons of wastewater per day.

The plant will serve existing neighborhoods along Newtown’s western border, including Echo Valley and Florida Park. A total of 35,000 feet of sewer pipeline will extend future service to the Episcopal Academy and the Ashford development on Route 252, as well as the Marville commercial complex on West Chester Pike.

Route 3 To See 75 Percent Traffic Increase With Continued Marville Developments

A traffic expert told Newtown Township planners that the proposed Marville development on the north side of West Chester Pike (near the Edgmont/Newtown border) would ultimately add about 75 percent to the area’s weekend traffic volume, and 50 percent on weekday afternoons. Developer Claude De Botton is currently seeking approval for his centerpiece 62-acre lifestyle village component of the Marville master plan. An adjacent shopping center (The Shops of Marville) to the east has already been approved and excavated, while commercial sites to the west have been operating for several years.

About two-thirds of the new Marville traffic will be destined for the lifestyle village, which will feature a hotel, retail shops, restaurants and an arts conservatory.

The increased volume means that some traffic movements in and out of the village could operate at an ‘F’ level during peak hours, which translates to an average delay of more than 80 seconds per driver. A number of improvements and driveway lane patterns could be employed to alleviate some traffic flow issues, but PennDOT would have the last word on all changes to the state road. The lifestyle village plan will come before township planners again in September.

Plans for the duPont estate moving forward

The Rouse Group recently came before the planning commission for another two-hour session, moving the proposed Ashford Development on the former duPont site slightly closer to preliminary approval. Planners applauded a reduction in the unit count to 582 from an original count of 650, but the commission wants the number to be in the 400 to 450 range, which the developer says is economically impossible.

Marple Newtown School District budget passed

The Marple Newtown School District passed its annual budget, raising property taxes about 4 percent. The $56,250,000 solution to next year's fiscal demands raises the district's millage rate to 14.14, and will raise the annual tax bill for the average $254,000 homeowner about $140.

Edgmont Tightens Its Building Codes

Edgmont Township will be slightly more restrictive than the state building code when it comes to permit requirements. Supervisors approved, April 19, an amendment now making permits necessary for certain work previously not needing that step. Since the new regulations are tighter than the state's Uniform Construction Code, an ordinance amendment was a necessary procedure.

The key component is the requirement of a permit for construction of any accessory structure greater than 300 square feet, as well as any accessory building which includes utilities such as electric and water service.

The amendment includes a list of building maintenance and construction items not requiring a permit, such as re-roofing of less than 25 percent of an existing roof; window and door replacement, which does not change the opening; siding; certain plumbing work not altering drainage; non-structural deck alterations; minor electrical work and several other categories.

Source: County Press

Public Sewers Are In Edgmont’s Future

Edgmont Supervisors took the next step in what they have considered an overdue plan to provide public sewers to parts of the township. [Read more...]